<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.7" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Work In Solutions</title>
	<link>http://www.workinsolutions.co.za/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:09:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>KING III</title>
		<description>The King Report on Governance for South Africa 2009 (King III), which was released on 1 September 2009, provides a list of best practice principles to assist and guide directors in Corporate Governance.

King III applies to all corporate entities regardless of the manner incorporation, whether in the public, private sectors ...</description>
		<link>http://www.workinsolutions.co.za/blog/?p=47</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>STRAUTMANN V SILVER MEADOWS TRADING 99 (PTY) LTD T/A MUGG AND BEAN SUNCOAST AND OTHERS</title>
		<description>Case Number: D 412/07

Judgment Date: 09 June 2009

Jurisdiction: Labour Court, Durban

Judge: Van Niekerk J

Subject: Review

CCMA Arbitration

Issue: Certificate of outcome did not constitute a jurisdictional ruling.

Summary of Facts: The employee was employed by Kishara CC t/a Mugg and Bean Suncoast as a general manager and was also a member of the ...</description>
		<link>http://www.workinsolutions.co.za/blog/?p=43</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>SCHEME DATA SERVICES (PTY) LTD V MYHILL N.O &#038; CCMA &#038; OTHER</title>
		<description>Case No. JR 1456/06

Judgement Date: 05 December 2008

Jurisdiction: Labour Court, Johannesburg

Judge: Ngalwana J

Subject: Unfair Dismissal :Procedural fairness of dismissal: Jurisdiction

Issue: Application to review and set aside decision of commissioner in arbitration. Commissioner had held dismissal of employee to be substantially and procedurally unfair.

Facts: Employee’s employment was terminated for operational reasons ...</description>
		<link>http://www.workinsolutions.co.za/blog/?p=40</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>HARLEY V BACARAC TRADING 39 (PTY) LTD</title>
		<description>Case Number: J 2543 / 08

Judgment Date: 23 March 2009

Jurisdiction: Labour Court, Braamfontein

Judge: Van Niekerk J

Subject: Suspension without Pay

Issue: Urgent application to declare employee’s continued unpaid suspension unfair and to order the Employer to pay his remuneration.

Summary of Facts: The employee was a Technical Director at a salary of R40 ...</description>
		<link>http://www.workinsolutions.co.za/blog/?p=38</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Potgieter V National Commissioner of SAPS and one other</title>
		<description>Issue: Unfair discrimination claim arising from sexual harassment or victimization of employee by employer.  Court must determine the liability of the employer arising from the conduct of its employee. In doing so the court had to determine whether the employer should have taken further steps to address the complaint of ...</description>
		<link>http://www.workinsolutions.co.za/blog/?p=36</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Discrimination on the basis of race: Employers will pay a high sanction!</title>
		<description>The consequences for any employer guilty of racially discriminatory practices are severe. In a recent Labour Court case which is discussed in full below, an employer was held to have unfairly determined an employee's pay on the basis of race, and to have unfairly dismissed her for exercising her right ...</description>
		<link>http://www.workinsolutions.co.za/blog/?p=34</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Suspending an Employee</title>
		<description>Mogothle v Premier of the Northwest Province; The member of the executive council for agriculture conservation and the environment
 
Case No. J 2622/08
Judgement Date: 05 January 2009
Jurisdiction: Labour Court, Johannesburg
Judge: Van Niekerk, Judge
Subject: Suspension without a hearing

Issue: The Employee, who was a deputy director general of department of agriculture and development in NWP, brought an ...</description>
		<link>http://www.workinsolutions.co.za/blog/?p=31</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The bitter side of desert (ing)</title>
		<description>It is that time of year again when holidays are over and the temptation not to go back to the grindstone looms for employees. This could pose problems for the employer who feels the absconding employee should be dismissed.Before dismissing, it is imperative for employers to take the necessary precautions ...</description>
		<link>http://www.workinsolutions.co.za/blog/?p=15</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>What employers can do if their operational requirements demand overtime work - and the workers refuse to comply&#8230;</title>
		<description>Ford Motor Company of SA (Pty) Ltd v NUMSA &#38; others

Labour Court: Johannesburg 16 October 2007

The employer, with production deadlines to meet, scheduled overtime for their employees. There was an issue regarding the working of overtime on a particular Saturday and the union informed management to cease the scheduling of ...</description>
		<link>http://www.workinsolutions.co.za/blog/?p=14</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>SETA Unable to Reclaim Grant</title>
		<description>Tourism, Hospitality &#38; Sports Education &#38; Training Authority v TMS-Shezi Industrial Services

Labour Court Johannesburg: 26 July 2007

The Tourism, Hospitality &#38; Sports Education &#38; Training Authority, a SETA, concluded an agreement in terms of which the defendant would provide training for learners under the Skills Development Act 97 of 1998 ("Skills ...</description>
		<link>http://www.workinsolutions.co.za/blog/?p=13</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
